Saturday, December 31, 2011

The Social Business Starting Point


After reading Riitta Raesmaa's excellent post "Trust-based Collaboration and Cultural Differences", a summary post of the topics Riitta has been writing about during 2011, I was inspired to do the same thing. Looking back, I realize that my main theme for this year has been social networking as the operating system of an enterprise, and that using social software to enable people to connect with each other, with the resources they need, and with the tasks they need to carry out to achieve their goals is the starting point of a social business transformation (see ConnectednessSocial business can be really simpleWe Should All Care More About Transparency)

Happy New Year! 

Informal networks have always been important, if not to say critical, for good decision-making in organizations. They have compensated for the lack of bandwidth and the slowness of formal information flows, the ones which typically follow the hierarchic reporting structure of organizations, by rapidly bringing new and more complete information to the awareness of decision-makers. Yet until recently the power to build and maintain informal networks were primarily possessed by those people within an organization who possessed formal positions in the hierarchy. Their positions allowed them to allocate the time and resources to build their informal networks. Anyone who had a strong informal network could influence decision-making, and informal networks were considered as something bad – especially if someone outside the hierarchy had strong informal networks.

Today informal networks are increasingly considered as an organizational asset, especially if they become visible and if more people are given the chance to develop them. The social web and enterprise social software enables people to connect and build their own networks without much effort. This means they can more easily get access to the information needed making the right decisions themselves, right there in the situation where they are need to make a decision. As more people are empowered to do this, the enterprise becomes more agile and responsive, increasing its chances of surviving and thriving in a global, connected and rapidly changing business landscape. So if there is any art the modern enterprise needs to learn and master, it is the art of connectedness.

The core of social business is to create transparent and open digital environments that people are free to join and where they can participate and engage in conversations with anyone about the things they care about. At work, the things people care about would most likely be their work, their colleagues, their customers, and their shared objectives and purpose. You can mobilize them to engage about virtually anything, be it ideas, tasks, customers, products, continuous improvement, or processes.

When people can gather around the things they care about, even if what they care about is just to get their work done, they get the opportunity to get to know and build trust in each other, creating and developing the kind of relationships that make up the foundation of sustainable organizations.

So, the core of social business is to connect people with other people, tasks and information. That way you can mobilize people throughout the workforce, activating the relevant talent and expertise, to achieve just about anything.

What is still lacking in most online work environments is a really intelligent system that informs people about what’s going on elsewhere, a system that provides them with cues and signals telling them when it’s time to act, when there is certain information they need to consider, and so forth. It is common knowledge that we need workplace awareness to be able to work together efficiently and effectively. We need workplace awareness to be able to make the right decisions, because a decision is right only if it serves not just our own goals but also the goals and purpose of the entire enterprise – and that can’t be done without considering many of the decisions and actions other people make

Most online work environments are still just information self-service desks with a bunch of applications for performing specific tasks. They are designed to keep us on track with the task we have at hand so that we perform the task as efficiently as possible. Unfortunately, they are also designed for sub-optimization when they really should be designed for synergy-creation and coordination, allowing us to look in any direction in order to find the right path forward. An environment that is designed for synergies and coordination must by necessity be built on openness and transparency. This is one of the main reasons why I am such a strong advocate for openness and transparency.








Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Social Collaboration vs The Existing Communication Culture

Sometimes (and quite often according to my own observations) there is a significant gap between the existing organizational culture and the kind of culture that readily will embrace and adopt social software and social collaboration practices. The existing communication culture, which can be seen as a subset of the organizational culture, reveals a lot about an organization’s readiness to adopt social collaboration practices. Here are a few characteristics of organizations where there is high resistance (or ignorance), especially among management, towards the new ways of communicating and interacting which social software enables.

Tightly controlled communication flows

  • The organization is strictly hierarchic in the sense that it is not ok to bypass the chain of command when communicating with others. Hence it is unthinkable that an employee will communicate directly with the CEO, and vice versa. Management wants to maintain the illusion of being in control of employee-to-employee communication, especially when it comes to employee-to-management or employee-to-group communication.
  • The organization is heavily dependent on email communication. They are using email groups for communicating information to specific groups. No-one is allowed to email any other groups than the ones they belong to. They are not allowed to email other groups within the same hierarchical branch of  the organization chart, or everybody within their branch or division. It might even by that only managers are allowed to email groups, while all others are just passive receivers (forget about announcing that you're leaving for another job).
Overreliance on traditional communication technologies
  • There is little awareness of other ways of communicating than face-to-face meeting, phone calls, emails and documents, as well as of the limitations and problems of the existing ways of communicating. The technologies provided by the organization are limited to phones, email, and a traditional intranet which serves as a top-down, one-way communication channel and information self-service portal.
  • The individuals in the workforce are not very used to new technologies such as smartphones, web conferencing, chat/IM even in their private lives. Virtual collaboration does practically not exist and even if there is an inherent need for it, it is rarely articulated. Awareness of the business drivers and possibilities for virtual collaboration is low.
Lack of understanding of the importance of communication
  • Managers don’t see communication as their key responsibility and their communication skills are not being considered important when appointed as managers. They are considered good managers because they are loyal to the management and bureaucrats who love - and excel at - reporting facts and figures upwards (and sometimes downwards) in the hieararchy.
  • Communication skills and the understanding of the importance of communication is also low across the workforce. Many employees believe that the purpose of documentation is to produce documents and don’t really understand that the purpose is to communicate certain information in an effective and efficient way to anyone who might need it.
How do these observations relate to / correlate with your own observations? Which barriers do you see as the main ones when it comes to failing to adopt social collaboration practices?

Saturday, November 26, 2011

What do you think about the future of work and business?

Will it be more knowledge-intense?
Will it require increasing specialization?
Will it need to get done faster?
Will it require better use of talent?
Will it require more creativity and innovation?
Will it require that we use our intellectual and social capital more effectively?
Will it require more involvement of customers, partners and other external stakeholders?
Will it need to change and adapt to changing conditions more rapidly?
Will it require faster access to information and expertise?
Will it require people to collaborate more?
Will it require organizations to collaborate more?

If you answer yes to most of these questions, when do you plan to get started to prepare for success (or avoid extinction)?
In five years from now?
In three years?
How much time do you have that your competitors don't have?
How do you know they didn't start already yesterday?
When are you going to find out?
How about now?

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Social business can be really simple

Sometimes we tend to overcomplicate things, and we fail to see the forest for the trees. The same applies for social business.

Social business doesn't have to be that hard - and it shouldn't be. In fact, by focusing on the core, social business can be made really simple.

The core of social business is to create transparent and open digital environments that people are free to join and where they can participate and engage in conversations with anyone about the things they care about. At work, the things people care about would most likely be their work, their colleagues, their customers, and their shared objectives and purpose. You can mobilize them to engage about virtually anything, be it ideas, tasks, customers, products, continuous improvement, or processes.

When people can gather around the things they care about, even if what they care about is just to get their work done, they get the opportunity to get to know and build trust in each other, creating and developing the kind of relationships that make up the foundation of sustainable organizations.

This is why connecting people is the core of social business, and here are four ways to do it and why you should do it.

#1 Connect people to each other
When people can connect to each other and engage in conversations about the thinkgs they care about, they are likely to become more engaged and develop a sense of shared identity that turns them into more motivated, productive and cooperative coworkers.

#2 Connect people to their work
When people can connect to their tasks and the information and people they need to perform those tasks, it will increase their efficiency and productivity because they will get the right things done in the right way faster.

#3 Connect people with shared interests
When people who share the same interests or challenges can connec and share (reuse) expertise and lessons across borders, it increases effectiveness by reducing sub-optimization, improving decision-making and reducing redundant work.

#4 Connect people to their markets
When people can connect to people and information residing outside their own organizations, they get the opportunity to listen and learn from, as well as influence, their ever-changing and dynamic external environment. That enables them to anticipate and address problems and opportunities, to become more proactive. It contributes to making the organization as a whole more responsive and agile and increases it's ability to innovate and grow.

So, the core of social business is to connect people with other people, tasks and information. That way you can mobilize people throughout the workforce, activating the relevant talent and expertise, to achieve just about anything.

For many organizations a good starting point is to increase employee engagement by connecting people. Social software can help you do that, but like any technology social software is just an accelerator. It is not the spark that lights the fire. Whatever it is that might make people in your organization feel disempowered, you will need to find the root cause and fix it. By enabling people to connect and have conversations, you will probably find out where you should be looking.


Thursday, October 27, 2011

Can your company survive without connectedness?

Re-using existing intellectual assets and enabling people to perform to their full potential is the required next step in operational excellence. With better connections we can solve problems and act upon opportunities in a fraction of the usual time. We can achieve it fewer resources and by activating underutilized resources such as expertise hidden in distant corners of the enterprise. The digitalization of businesses has provided the foundation for building powerful networks and utilizing the power of those networks. All that has to be done now is to join up the dots, or rather, to enable them to connect by themselves, and make sure that the concepts of collective intelligence, crowd-sourcing and social collaboration find their way into the company.

Can your company survive without doing this, without connectedness?

I posted this question at a webinar hosted by Central Desktop this Tuesday. Below you can wiew the webinar recording or simply browse through the slides.

 
Collaboration Insights Webinar: Can Your Company Survive Without Connectedness? from Central Desktop on Vimeo.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Transforming into a social business

Tieto has just published a strategy paper on how to transform into a social business at Slideshare. The paper, written by my colleague Philipp Rosenthal and me, questions the technocentric way that many organizations have approached social business (or rather social software) this far and suggests a business-oriented approach to socializing business operations, focusing on how to use social technologies to support prioritized business operations and on supporting the transformation with the right change management approach. Transforming into a social business
View more documents from Tieto Corporation